Tuesday, March 26, 2019

A claim that the moon is artificial and parked!

looking through data related to the origins of earth's moon we have seen some articles titled 'who parked the moon!' and 'the moon is artificial' these articles are proposing that the moon isn't from the same material as earth's. We have seen and looked into data for and against this weird claim that the moon is artificial and maybe even 'parked' .To our own surprise these claims didn't seem so bold after we looked at the reasoning. Our own conclusions here are that the moon maybe be artificial after all or drifted into earth orbit from elsewhere. Or even more controversial may have been intelligently created, this breaks the standard theory that the moon's existence was the result of a collision with another body in our solar systems earliest origins.

So with that said , our readers are obviously going to ask 'what is so unusual about the moon ?'. Well lets see, Despite the U.S having announced six visits to the moon between 1969 and 1972, the Moon still remains a riddle to scientists in many regards. Even some mainstream scientist have said its possible that the solutions to these riddles could indicate an extraterrestrial aspect. Dr robert jastrow called the moon 'the Rosetta Stone of the planets' , he is the first chairman of NASA’s Lunar Exploration Committee, scientists had hoped by studying the composition of the Moon, to resolve some of the mysteries of how our planet and solar system came into existence.

After the six Moon landings science writer Earl Ubell declared the following:,

'the lunar Rosetta Stone remains a mystery. The Moon is more complicated than anyone expected; it is not simply a kind of billiard ball frozen in space and time, as many scientists had believed. Few of the fundamental questions have been answered, but the Apollo rocks and recordings have spawned a score of mysteries, a few truly breath-stopping.'

Among the anomalies  is the fact that the Moon is far older than previously imagined. By examining tracks burned into Moon rocks by cosmic rays, scientists have dated them as billions of years old. Some have been dated back 4.5 billion years, that is far older than the Earth and nearly as old as the solar system. The Moon has at least three distinct layers of rocks. Contrary to the idea that heavier objects sink, the heavier rocks are found on the surface. And there is a definite disparity in the distribution of minerals.

Ubell asked: “If the Earth and Moon were created at the same time, near each other, why has one body got all the iron the Earth and the other the Moon not much?''

The differences suggest that the Earth and Moon came into being far from each other, Most of the Moon has been found to be extremely dry and does not appear to ever had water in any substantial amounts. No Moon rocks brought back, regardless of where they were found, contained free water or even water molecules bound into the minerals. Yet Apollo 16 astronauts found Moon rocks that contained bits of rusted iron. Since oxidation requires oxygen and free hydrogen, this rust indicates there must be water somewhere on the Moon.

in 2015 july 23rd water was finally found. the link to this nasa paper is here:


So despite an over all lack of water there has been a very localised finds. Although we haven't seen much if anything said more about this. other than this video below.

A  vapor cloud eruption lasted 14 hours and covered an area of some 100 square miles, prompting Rice University physicists Dr. John Freeman, Jr. and Dr. H. Ken Hills to announce the event as “one of the most exciting discoveries yet” indicating water within the Moon. The two physicists claimed the water vapor came from deep inside the Moon, apparently released during a moonquake. Some NASA officials offered a more mundane, and some what questionable, explanation. They speculated that two tanks on Apollo descent stages containing between 60 and 100 pounds of water became stressed and ruptured, releasing their contents. Freeman and Hills declined to accept this explanation, pointing out that the two tanks from Apollo 12 and 14 were some 180 kilometers apart yet the water vapor was detected with the same flux at both sites although the instruments faced in opposite directions. Many more understandably questioned the odds of two separate tanks breaking simultaneously and how such a small quantity of water could produce 100 square miles of vapor.

Moon rocks were found to be magnetized, this was not strong enough to pick up a paper clip, but magnetic nevertheless. yet there is no official detection of a magnetic field on the Moon itself. So where did the magnetism come from? Another oddity in the mix is the presence of maria, or large seas of smooth solidified molten rock,. These maria indicate nothing less than a vast outpouring of lava at some distant time. It has now been confirmed that some of the Moon’s craters are of internal origin. Dispite these findings there is no indication that the Moon has ever been hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.

Another puzzle is that almost all four-fifths  of the maria are located on the Moon’s Earthside hemisphere. Few maria mark the far side of the Moon, often erroneously referred to as the 'dark side.' Yet the far side contains many more craters and mountainous areas. In comparison to the rest of the Moon, the maria are relatively free of craters suggesting that craters were covered by lava flow. Then there are the mascons — large dense circular masses lying 20 to 40 miles below the center of the Moon’s maria. The mascons were discovered because their denseness distorted the orbits of our spacecraft flying over or near them. One scientist proposed that the mascons are heavy iron meteorites that plunged deep into the Moon while it was in a soft, formable stage. This theory has been discounted since meteorites strike with such high velocities, they would vaporize on contact. Another mundane explanation is that the mascons are nothing more than lava-filled caverns, but skeptics say there isn’t enough lava present to accomplish this. It would seem these mascons are huge disk-shaped objects possibly of artificial construction. It is unlikely that large circular disks located directly under the center of the maria like a giant bulls-eye happened by accident or coincidence.

Between 1969 and 1977, Apollo mission seismographic equipment registered up to 3,000 “moonquakes” each year of operation. Most of the vibrations were quite small and were caused by meteorite strikes or falling booster rockets. But many other quakes were detected deep inside the Moon. This internal creaking is believed to be caused by the gravitational pull of our planet as most moonquakes occur when the Moon is closest to the Earth. An event occurred in 1958 in the Moon’s Alphonsus crater,this shook the idea that all internal moonquake activity was simply settling rocks. November of that year, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory startled the scientific world by photographing the first recorded gaseous eruption on the Moon near the crater’s peak.

Kozyrev attributed this to escaping fluorescent gases. He also detected a reddish glow characteristic of carbon compounds, which apeared move and disappear after an hour. Some scientist refused to accept Kozyrev's findings until astronomers at Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crest of ridges in the Artistarchus region in 1963 , Days later, colored lights on the Moon lasting more than an hour were reported at two separate observatories.

Seismic signals from different stations on the lunar surface detect identical vibrations. It is difficult to accept this movement as a natural phenomenon bacause of the exact the same way it accours each time the Moon passed near the Earth. There is evidence to indicate the Moon may be hollow. Studies of Moon rocks indicate that the Moon’s interior differs from the Earth’s mantle in ways suggesting a very small, or even nonexistent, core. As far back as 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, 'If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the Moon be less dense than the outer parts. Indeed, it would seem that the Moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.'.Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, while scoffing at the possibility of a hollow moon, nevertheless admitted that since heavier materials were on the surface, it is quite possible that giant caverns exist within the Moon.

The most startling evidence that the Moon could be hollow came on November 20, 1969, when the Apollo 12 crew, after returning to their command ship, sent the lunar module (LM) ascent stage crashing back onto the Moon creating an artificial moonquake. The module struck the surface aproximatly 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site where ultra-sensitive seismic equipment recorded something both unexpected and astounding, the Moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. The vibration wave took almost eight minutes to reach a peak, and then decreased in intensity. At a news conference that day, one of the co-directors of the seismic experiment, Maurice Ewing, told reporters that scientists were at a loss to explain the ringing.


to quote :

'As for the meaning of it, I’d rather not make an interpretation right now. But it is as though someone had struck a bell, say, in the belfry of a church a single blow and found that the reverberation from it continued for 30 minutes.',

It was later  established that smaller vibrations had continued on the Moon for more than an hour. The phenomenon was repeated when the Apollo 13’s third stage was sent crashing onto the Moon by radio command, striking with the equivalent of 11 tons of TNT. According to NASA, this time the Moon 'reacted like a gong.' Although seismic equipment was more than 108 miles from the crash site, recordings showed reverberations lasted for three hours and 20 minutes and traveled to a depth of 22 to 25 miles. Subsequent studies of man-made crashes on the Moon yielded similar results. After one impact the Moon reverberated for four hours. This ringing coupled with the density problem on the Moon reinforces the idea of a hollow moon. Scientists hoped to record the impact of a meteor large enough to send shock waves to the Moon’s core and back and settle the issue.

That opportunity came on May 13, 1972, when a large meteor stuck the Moon with the equivalent force of 200 tons of TNT. After sending shock waves deep into the interior of the Moon, scientists were baffled to find that none returned, confirming that there is something unusual about the Moon’s core, or lack thereof. Dr. Farouk El Baz was quoted as saying, “There are many undiscovered caverns suspected to exist beneath the surface of the Moon. Several experiments have been flown to the Moon to see if there actually were such caverns.” The results of these experiments have not been made public. It seems apparent that the Moon has a tough, hard outer shell and a light or nonexistent interior. The Moon’s shell contains dense minerals such as titanium, used on Earth in the construction of aircraft and space vehicles. Many people still recall watching our astronauts on TV as they vainly tried to drill through the crust of a Moon maria. Their specially designed drills could only penetrate a few inches. The puzzle of the Moon’s hard surface was compounded by the discovery of what appeared to be processed metals.

Experts were surprised to find lunar rocks bearing brass, mica and amphibole in addition to the near-pure titanium. Uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 elements not previously found in nature — were discovered in Moon rocks, according to the Argone National Laboratory. While still trying to explain the presence of these materials, scientists were further startled to learn of rust-proof iron particles in a soil sample from the Sea of Crisis. In 1976, the Associated Press reported that the Soviets had announced the discovery of iron particles that 'do not rust' in samples brought back by an unmanned Moon mission in 1970. iron that does not rust is unknown in nature and was beyond  Earth technology at the time, although we do see some science forums now have post that claim to achive this. .

Undoubtedly the greatest mystery concerning our Moon is how it came to be there in the first place. Prior to the Apollo missions, one serious theory as to the Moon’s origin was that it broke off of the Earth eons ago. Although no one could positively locate where on Earth it originated, many speculated the loss of material explained the huge gouge in the Earth, which forms the Pacific Ocean. However, this idea was discarded when it was found that there is little similarity between the composition of our world and the Moon. A more recent theory had the Moon created out of space debris left over from the creation of the Earth. This concept proved untenable in light of current gravitational theory, which indicates that one large object will accumulate all loose material, leaving none for the formation of another large body. It is now generally accepted that the Moon originated elsewhere and entered the Earth’s gravitational field at some point in the distant past.

Many theories have diverged — one stating that the Moon was originally a planet which collided with the Earth creating debris which combined forming the Moon while another states the Moon, while wandering through our solar system, was captured and pulled into orbit by Earth’s gravity. Neither of these theories are especially compelling because of the lack of evidence that neither the Earth nor the Moon seem to have been physically disrupted by a past close encounter. There is no debris in space indicating a past collision and it does not appear that the Earth and the Moon developed during the same time period.

As for the 'capture' theory, even scientist Isaac Asimov, well known for his works of fiction, has written: 'It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the Moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible.' Asimov was right to consider the Moon’s orbit — it is not only nearly a perfect circle, but stationary, one side always facing the Earth with only the slightest variation. As far as we know, it’s the only natural satellite with such an orbit.

This circular orbit is especially odd considering that the Moon’s center of mass lies more than a mile closer to the Earth than its geometric center. This fact alone should produce an unstable, wobbly orbit, much as a ball with its mass off center will not roll in a straight line. Additionally, almost all of the other satellites in our solar system orbit in the plane of their planet’s equator. This is not the case with the moon, whose orbit lies strangely nearer the Earth’s orbit around the Sun or inclined to the Earth’s ecliptic by more than five degrees. Add to this the fact that the Moon’s bulge — located on the side facing away from Earth — thus negating the idea that it was caused by the Earth’s gravitational pull — makes for an off-balanced world.

to quote science writer William Roy Shelton, who wrote, 'It is important to remember that something had to put the Moon at or near its present circular pattern around the Earth.'

Just as an Apollo spacecraft circling the Earth every 90 minutes while 100 miles high has to have a velocity of roughly 18,000 miles per hour to stay in orbit, so something had to give the Moon the precisely required velocity for its weight and altitude., A point seldom noted in considering the origin of the Moon is that it is extremely unlikely that any object would just stumble into the right combination of factors required to stay in orbit. ‘Something had to put the Moon at its altitude, on its course and at its speed. The question is what was that ‘something’? If the precise and stationary orbit of the Moon is seen as sheer coincidence, is it also coincidence that the Moon is at just the right distance from the Earth to completely cover the Sun during an eclipse?.While the diameter of the Moon is a mere 2,160 miles against the Sun’s gigantic 864,000 miles, it is nevertheless in just the proper position to block out all but the Sun’s flaming corona when it moves between the Sun and the Earth.

Asimov explained: “There is no astronomical reason why the Moon and the Sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion.” Is it merely coincidence? How does one explain this and many other Moon mysteries?

In July 1970, two Russian scientists, Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, published an article in the Soviet journal Sputnik entitled “Is the Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?” They advanced the theory that the Moon is not a completely natural world, but a planetoid that was hollowed out eons ago in the far reaches of space by intelligent beings possessing a technology far superior to ours. The theory goes along the lines that machines were used to melt rock and form large cavities within the Moon, spewing the molten refuse onto the surface. Protected by a hull-like inner shell plus a reconstructed outer shell of metallic rocky junk, this gigantic craft was steered through the cosmos and finally parked in orbit around the Earth.

In their article Vasin and Shcherbakov wrote, “Abandoning the traditional paths of ‘common sense,’ we have plunged into what may at first sight seem to be unbridled and irresponsible fantasy.

But the more minutely we go into all the information gathered by man about the Moon, the more we are convinced that there is not a single fact to rule out our supposition. Not only that, but many things so far considered to be lunar enigmas are only explainable in the light of this new hypothesis.”

Outrageous as the spaceship moon theory might first appear, consider how this model reconciles all of the mysteries of the Moon.

It would explain why the Moon gives evidence of being much older than the Earth and perhaps even our solar system and why there are three distinct layers within the Moon, with the densest materials in the outside layer, exactly as one would expect of the 'hull' of a spacecraft. It could also explain why such lack of water is  found on the Moon’s surface, yet there is evidence it exists deep inside. The theory also would explain the strange maria and mascons, perhaps the remnants of the machinery used to hollow out the Moon. The idea of an artificial satellite could explain the odd, rhythmic 'moonquakes' as artificial constructs reacting the same way during periods of stress from the Earth’s pull. And artificial equipment beneath the Moon’s surface might be the source of the gas clouds that have been observed.

Intelligent “terraforming” of the Moon could prove the solution to an argument between “hot moon” and “cold moon” scientists, they are both right! it seems liley that the Moon originally was a cold world, which was transformed into an artifical satalite by artificially heating and expelling vast quantities of its interior. the theory might also explain the seeming contradictions over the question of a hollow moon. If the Moon originally was a solid world which was artificially hollowed out, there would be evidence of both phases—exactly what we have with current Moon knowledge. An artificially hollowed-out Moon would explain why the satellite rings like a bell for hours after struck and why specimens of tough, refractory metals such as titanium, chromium and circonium; “rust-proof” iron; Uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 have been found there. In fact, the spaceship moon theory may come closer than any other in reconciling the questions over the origin and amazing orbit of the Moon.

But we are not supposed to consider this thesis. The circular logic of modern science regarding the origins of the Moon runs something like this: We know that extraterrestrials don’t exist but we do know that the Moon exists and has been mentioned throughout human history. Yet the moons atributes seemingly fit with an artifical satalite not a natrual moon. Granted we understand the various argument in terms of vast distances for interstellar travel, ideas also relating to 'we having been contacted' , these are weak arguments to us. Pertucualry if we were contacted in modern times at all we really do not think the general public would be informed due to so many implications perticuylary from religious mind sets.


sources :





Monday, March 25, 2019

HISTORY AND FOUNDATION OF CERN ( article to be cleaned up and expanded )

For some lesser informed in the general public CERN seem to appear out of nowhere. Of course the reality is far more long term in its history than an early blip in technological progress. Starting way back in 1952 onwards, this was even before its official foundation in 1954.

CERN's main function was to provide particle accelerators and other infrastructure needed for high-energy physics research. many experiments have been conducted at CERN through international collaborations. The main site at Meyrin hosts a large computing facility,this is primarily used to store and analyse data from experiments and run simulated events.

many important achievements in particle physics have been made through the efforts @ at CERN. some of these are the following list:

1973: The discovery of neutral currents in the Gargamelle bubble chamber.

1983: The discovery of W and Z bosons in the UA1 and UA2 experiments.

1989: The determination of the number of light neutrino families at the Large Electron–Positron Collider (LEP) operating on the Z boson peak.

1995: The first creation of antihydrogen atoms in the PS210 experiment.

1999: The discovery of direct CP-violation in the NA48 experiment.

2010: The isolation of 38 atoms of anti-hydrogen 2011: Maintaining anti-hydrogen for over 15 minutes

Researchers have remote access to the facilities this results in the lab being a major wide area network hub. CERN is also the birthplace of the World Wide Web. the laboratory, in 2016 had 2,500 scientific, technical, and administrative staff members, and hosted about 12,000 users. In the same year, CERN generated 49 petabytes of data.


more added soon, stay tuned!


Friday, March 22, 2019


some of you have seen a few random post relating to credentials popping up seemingly out of context to any previous post, these post will be moved to pages. along with further description as to why we have these at all. thank you all for you continued support

Monday, March 11, 2019

Tommy robinson wrongly accused and incarcerated. ( download links we be given to those who ask for them )

After gathering much data we inevitably conclude via our own guide lines that practice investigation of any subject from as many angles as we can, that general confirmation bias against Tommy Robinson exist and appears to be driven from hidden sources that also drive a bias mainstream media.

We, like many others have concluded that the BBC fail grossly to follow their own guidelines. If we are seen to do the same then we always want to know about it ,we then actually do something about it. We take this very seriously, because such bias has and can still lead to defamation of character where there is no evidence to do so. It's utterly disgusting that in today's world we have people boasting a journalist title when in fact they do little to no research on the very subjects the write about. 

Again and again we don't see fair intellectual debate happening from big media sources that thousands now conclude are highly bias with hidden agendas to manipulate public opinion rather than being the transparency they often claim to be. Please note that any opposing views really have to be sensibly and verifiably provable and without name calling and slander.

Integrity and politeness are at a low-cost and requires a little effort. Thousands have followed tommy's activism and of those thousands the larger percent are agreeing with what he has to say. While the big media sources not only don't agree but lie about what he says literally putting words on tommy's mouth and twisting what he does say to alternative interpretations that most don't make, but paint him in an undesirable light.  As a result some public citizens end up with a clouded view on tommy's politics and what he stands for. or more correctly its clouded at best and false at the worst. 

At the time of writing a recent documentary from tommy and his associates exposes highly bias and racist name calling against tommy. This is some of the very same behaviour that tommy has been accused of. Yet after our own investigation we have found no such damning evidence at all against tommy. Plenty of damning evidence of racism and name calling from BBC journalist john Sweeny though. Becuse of this many people now feel that Mr Sweeny should be fired. If not then the people wanting fair unbaised debate can only conclude this translates to the BBC not only breaking their own guide lines but actually not giving a damn about public opinion as long as they get paid by the public. 

Now ask yourself if its true that corrupt and down right lazy mind sets in big media are resulting to name calling and smear campaigns, doesn't it advertise that alternative sources are of high importance more than ever. Even If you are against tommy's views its never been more important in cases like this to have the raw un clipped un-edited un-biased footage related to such things. Only when we can have originals can we see who's truly being fair and who isn't on both sides. Some of the public have been very confused on tommy's views because of this bias. Yet when they meet tommy in person this confusion clears up fairly well. and tommy often makes a friend or an acquaintance when this happens.. 

We should always remind ourself that for good people to do nothing, well you heard it before 'that's how evil comes about' ,So if you consider yourself a good person who is passionate about doing the right thing then you have an obligation to research both sides of any opposing groups to discern who is justified and who is not. How you should do this is not listen to what each side says about the other, but research them individually. because if there are false accusation's thrown around from ether side then you can't trust that. get the orignal forms of information or as close as possible and connect the dots for yourself rather than having corruption think for you. It appears that the days when big media did a fair interview are long gone, now they just try to talk over the interviewer and put words in their mouth. 

We have seen this way to much now and the public are getting sick to the core of it. 

We have concluded that the confirmation bias we see is seemingly driven by hidden agendas and by eslity swayed self indoctrinated individuals. It appears to be based in shadowy groups influencing big media to lean towards a police state and erosion of democracy in favour of a dictatorship. (Brexit anyone?)

We have a gathering of downloads and footage that are directly from tommy's work on his YouTube account. What this means is that whether you are for or against tommy's efforts and activism you will have a fair and justified education and set of evidence before you. Its our view that this is crucial before you decide on your conclusions., With out general hearsay of what he did and said and condoned. most importantly we always try to move forward with out a drive to knowingly make things up . As many have concluded certain BBC employees are making things up because fiction ,drama and lies sell, many also feel this is pretty disgusting considering the BBC ask the public to pay for their work. 

The raw footage is as it is in its original forms with out clips that are used to perpetrate a one-sided unfair bias. You maybe shocked, as this might cause you to think that this exposes a disgusting corruption. It does for us, if it don't for you then so be it.

It has for many thousands by the way. 

our last heart-felt statement with things like this, is that unless you know your enemy you cannot win fairly and justifiably for the betterment of the many. if not for the betterment of the human race. Always make sure you know what you're talking about before you call a person out as a liar. 

Wednesday, March 6, 2019


Although its an old discovery some scientific authors and even general bloggers,publishers are releasing more data and perspectives on the Sonoluminescence effect. This was first discovered at the University of Cologne in 1934 during work related to sonar technologies.

H. Frenzel and H. Schultes put an ultrasound transducer in a tank of photographic developer fluid. They were doing this in the hope that is would speed up the development process. Instead, they noticed tiny dots on the film after developing and realized that the bubbles in the fluid were emitting light with the ultrasound turned on. At the time It was too difficult to analyze the effect in early experiments because of the complex environment of a large number of short-lived bubbles. A new acronym was later used to refer to the effect as MBSL (MULTI-BUBBLE SONOLUMINESCENCE).

years later In 1960 Dr. Peter Jarman from the Imperial College of London proposed the most reliable theory of Sonoluminescence phenomenon. The collapsing bubble generates an imploding shock wave that compresses and heats the gas at the center of the bubble to extremely high temperature. This wasn't proven until later in 1989 when D. Felipe Gaitan and Lawrence Crum, who produced stable single-bubble sonoluminescence (SBSL)., a single bubble trapped in an acoustic standing wave emits a pulse of light with each compression of the bubble within the standing wave.

This technique allowed a more practical study of the phenomenon, because it isolated the complex effects into one stable, predictable bubble. It was realized that the temperature inside the bubble was hot enough to melt steel, as seen in an experiment done in 2012, below is a video related to this

The temperature inside the bubble as it collapsed reached about 12,000 kelvins. Interest in sonoluminescence was renewed when an inner temperature of such a bubble well above one million kelvins was postulated. This temperature is thus far not conclusively proven; however recent experiments conducted by the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign indicate temperatures around 20,000 K (19,700 °C; 35,500 °F)

We will be adding more on this later and how it might be used to high energy effciancey with out needs for fossil fuels industry energy technologies. The fact they we are even still using fossil fules for energy tech at all is a sure sign that rich oil companies really dont wan to let go of the power game thay have. we will explian more soon hang tight! 

and thank you to all our supporters! 

Thursday, February 14, 2019

herbal and amino acid research :Theanine

L-Ornithine is a nonprotein amino acid, that is an important intermediate of the urea cycle,. Ornithine binds with a molecule known as carbamoyl phosphate which requires ammonia to be produced and then is converted into L-Citrulline giving off urea as a byproduct. this has the beneficial effect of reducing ammonia concentrations in the blood and concomitantly increases urea.

Ammonia is a byproduct of the body metabolising protien's. Biochemical reactions in your body rapidly convert ammonia into less harmful molecules under normal conditions. Liver disease can cause ammonia levels to build up in your body. Liver disfunction can cause ammonia levels to build up in your brain causing permanent brain damage, a condition known as hepatic encephalopathy.

Ammonia and Brain Damage

Ammonia is a highly reactive and caustic molecule. According to the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, high levels of ammonia in the brain can impair the function of, and eventually kill, two types of cells, neurons and astrocytes. Neurons are responsible for the electrical and chemical communication that underlies brain function. Astrocytes are support cells, removing chemicals such as ammonia from the brain. Ammonia disrupts energy production in the brain and interferes with communication between neurons. This damage leads to a condition, hepatic encephalopathy, that manifests as sleep disturbances, mood disorders, poor cognition, anxiety, depression and movement disorders.

Causes of High Brain Ammonia

Liver disease is the primary cause of high ammonia in the brain. Alcohol-related liver disease, such as hepatitis and cirrhosis, commonly lead to ammonia-induced brain damage. Genetic deficiencies, called urea cycle disorders, in the enzymes that process ammonia into urea can cause high ammonia. High-protein diets can contribute to high ammonia levels. In general, continue to eat protein, but avoid eating large amounts in a single meal. Discuss your diet and what foods to avoid with your doctor.


more added soon on this

Saturday, February 2, 2019

Gary McKinnon's hacking case and asymmetric foundations of secrecy.

The hacker Gary McKinnon had a lot of publicity during the time of an older project we ran under the name of 'the reality explorations project' , if you were a reader you will see many similarities in this sites content. The paper known as Daily Mail published Gary’s story at the time. Gary's crime was basically that he hacked US GOV servers looking for evidence related to UFO subject matter. The FOIA doesn't seem to be enough for many people for valid reasons. Much of the data realised via the FOIA feels incomplete to say the least ,this leads to conclusions of information still being held back that people feel should be released along with the papers/documents released.

We also personally conclude as others have ,some of the secrecy is run ex-constitutionally and is therefore illegal. We conclude that this illegal practice also appears to have sub related aspects to over unity energy systems. See the Casimir effect for how we think this is even possible. Articles like this on their own are  bold claims , however when you open a closed view to other goings on and how Gary was unfairly treated some alarm bells begin to ring and people start to question and wonder when they see the dots and make connections.

It was to the founders own personal surprise that the daily mail did well in their report mentioning the motivation of the so-called hacking he was acussed of. If indeed we can call this hacking at all, Gary is from the UK and faced unfair extradition to the USA. Gary’s case could easily have been taken on UK grounds right from the start. Yes he did get accused of hacking USA servers but this really is not the main issue.

Briefly going back to those illegal activity claims on the side of the accusers, If sub-compartmented aspects of secret services in America and others are practising an illegal agenda among lower staff members then such lack of foundation and direction then makes sense that there will be systems like Gary claimed he found. That is to say he found computers set with blank passwords with a windows set up and remote desktop enabled! Nope we are not kidding, please don't ditch us in a knee jerk response just yet. Let us also remind you Linux based systems run on all the publicly known super computers in the world. Anyone worth their weight in knowledge of computers knows Microsoft has become a joke despite its early global successes, its lack of security is utterly pathetic and a big cause for concern in business and general home use.

With all this in mind and connecting the dots we see that it’s quite obvious there`s going to be a wide open door in some corners. But very few people you meet in the street are likely to even think up a plan to hack, let alone attempt to hack USA gov servers to look for UFO evidence and over unity energy systems that are sub related to this bigger picture. .,we do realise the boldness of the claims here. and welcome a counter debate with the intellectual honesty we so rarely come across in these subjects. 

Mr McKinnon himself claimed blanked passwords is what he found on some servers and laptops he gained access to. While to the layman its hard to imagine why such lack of security exist, and many will belive Gary's claim to be false we are personally not surprised. Our own lack of initial shock was and still is mainly due to so many other aspects of this that go way beyond a relatively short article. But just remember we already mentioned 'some illegal practice' along with all this. Much time has past since our older project this led to a rabbit hole of huge implications and conclusions. , one main worrying conclusion is  the people involved doing such things are often lower staff not the highest ranks. 

The Daily Mail said that David Blunkett twice pleaded with the U.S. for Gary McKinnon to have a fair trial in the UK. Gordon brown also sent an appeal. Mr Blunkett himself signed a 2003 Extradition Act which was later pushed to get Gary extradited. The paper reported that the US are flatly refusing to renegotiate the treaty. At the time Mr Blunkett suggested using video conferencing and modern tech to trial Gary fairly on US soil while Gary remains in Britain and serves a fair sentence in Britain Many people made the valid point that Gary is a British citizen and should be trailed in the UK. 

It was not as if he was doing any physical damage or part of any larger hacking or cyber crime group, Gary was only doing this on his own accord. The whole thing really did stink!, A lot of country's have released documents on the so-called UFO issue and appeared to be helping a much needed release of information requested often by the public via the  freedom of information act , America as usual are not co-operating to well on these issues and never have from its earliest levels of curiosity from the public as to whats going on .

 It did appear in this case the main drive was to make an example of Gary and a bunch of pathetic puppets doing nothing about it except the UK of course. In a way this is a complex political war between Gov., shadow Gov and corporative interest. or rather hidden criminal elements and  activist in the know, And it isn't going to end any time soon in our opinion. It is evolving though.

here’s Gary’ being interviewed below,


This was never a UK party issue. All UK party's and MPs in our opinion had an obligation to have Gary fairly tried in the UK.

Some concluded that this was partly to do with America being shown up and proved weak in the secrets there hiding. We say If they won't fight the corruption that perpetuates an illigal secrecy within USA and other country's, instead of allowing manipulation of facts. Then america dispite the ego filled mantras of making it 'GREAT' again will ironiclly be left on the side of the road of progress. despite current technological advancements. 

We do not condone hacking Gov Servers but we also do not condone illegal secrecy either. 

We belive there are countless reasons why we as citizens all need to raise awareness and stand up against this corruption. This has gone on like this only for 1 reason, the so-called UFO phenomena has more to do with this than Gary just hacking Gov Servers on American soil. We do think It is about  energy technologies ,far more in fact than it is about E.T. (extra terrestrial) existence. Some of these craft may indeed be ET in origin. lets please not go thinking that if you keep repeating 'why dont they land on the white house lawn' that it will happen. If only we got funded each time we heard that in the past.

The list of country's releasing documents as far as we have been able to discern include the following:

Britain, China, Denmark, Spain, Mexico, Canada , even russia have often been relatively open on these things 

America though , well we don't seem the same level of co-operation we would like to. 

It looks like Gary did not have to break down any resistance. For a start he found blank passwords and desktop windows PCs with remote desktop enabled! his claim, and we don't see any reason why he would be liying on this,Another point to make is what he was using to enable him to hack in the first place is commercially available software but we don't see the software companies being fined or taken to court!? or at least nothing mentioned about them. 

Well no that would stop corruption spying on your PC without you knowing right? ha! yea we know we know. you can hand us a tin foil hat and the jokes now :P

According to Paul hellyer ex Canadian defence minister America loses more money to secret black ops than any other country makes. Gary only got targeted because of what he found, or maybe it’s a grudge against the UK since a lot of documents  have been released.

You can’t really charge hacking here, maybe it’s trespassing? Or illegal spying? 

Gary won his appeal and got fair trial in the UK, since there was no evidence of the damage he was accused of. GO figure !

Thursday, January 31, 2019

Mark McCandlish credentials and a zero point energy science.




Mark McCandlish is an accomplished aerospace illustrator who has worked for many of the top aerospace corporations in the United States. His colleague, Brad Sorenson, has been inside a facility at Norton Air Force Base, where he witnessed so called ' alien reproduction vehicles' or ARV's. We have a bold claim here ,as do others that these are craft inspired by what appears to be non terrestrial or extraterrestrial craft and phenomena, That is for want of better explanation


As Far as we have heard and what others have claimed to know ,these craft were fully operational and hovering. In his testimony to the controversial 'Sirius disclosure' YouTube channel we are told that the US not only has operational antigravity propulsion devices, but the overall consensus is america has had them for many years. At the EMP we belive this to be very likely not due to the information here on its own but many other things we have collected data on. Not to mention the physics of tapping into a zero point energy field , that has been hinted at by mr Mcandlish on how these products operate their propulsion systems, these physics are hinted at via our geometry articles that are in many parts to make the various related points that are so often missed and overlooked in zero point energy theory and how it eventually equates to non locality sppect of reality among so many other things. 

The general claim of those involved is that these craft were developed through the study of extraterrestrial vehicles over the past fifty years. In addition 'sirius discloure' has drawings from aerospace inventor Brad Sorenson of the device's that he saw,as well as a schematic of one of these 'alien reproduction vehicles' (ARV for short) in some detail.

Saturday, January 26, 2019


For the most part we only have a theory on how planets are formed and even how these planets magnetic fields are generated. even earths plate-tectonics are only a theory, granted though this theory seems a very fitting model to what we see and observe.

However there are problems with some of these theory's for a start at the time of writing we have earths magnetic field at about 11.05 degrees off alignment with earth's physical axial rotation. This also appears to be altering at an increasing rate, we have found nothing that is satisfiable in current day physics to explain how this could be. Current theory dictates that the earth's magnetic field is generated by electrically conductive materials (molten iron core) within the earth which generate the magnetic field via its spin. This theory would be sound enough except for the 11.05 degrees asymmetric problem. If its spin that generates the feild then this should cause a relitive spin within the aearth more fluid matter to be in relitive alinement with the physical axis and spin It should be inline with the physical spin.

Progress is being made though,the basics of current theory assumes that planet formation is simultaneous with formation of its parent star. how this is thought to occur is that the huge gas cloud is disturbed , as a result of this it leads up to a gravitational collapse and eventually increases in spin, this eventually forms a hot dense centre known as a proto ‘parent’ star - leaving behind a thin cooling disc of gas. As the disc gets thinner, particles begin to collapse in and eventually become planets and those planets also end up with moons. it may sound reasonable and good , however we typically only see a final fully formed planet and as a result it is difficult to get a complete picture of the formation process and test these theories.

However this is changing,a team of research scientists were able to obtain the first ever image of an exoplanet in the process of forming. To achieve this the scientists used the Spectro-Polarimetric High-contrast Exoplanet Research (SPHERE) instrument, on the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (VLT), which features a coronagraph to block out the stars light, creating an artificial eclipse, and revealing the faint corona and any orbiting planetary bodies. The observations revealed the presence of a new-born gas giant orbiting its parent dwarf star PDS 70 scientists were able to photograph and determine its distance from the parent star to be 1.9 million miles. Further analysis showed that the temperature of this baby planet (~ 1200 Kelvin) is much hotter than fully formed planets which is what to be expected and inline with current theory.

This research has huge implications, as now for the first time, scientists are able to observe and study the different stages of stellar formation. This will hopefully lead to new insights and a better understanding of the key processes involved in planetary and solar system formation.






Paper: http://www.eso.org/public/archives/releases/sciencepapers/eso1821/eso1821a.pdf



DARPA’s history and drive appears to date back to the 1970's when they saw many vulnerabilities of U.S. aircraft and their on-board equipment was easy in terms of detection and attack by potential enemies, who were deploying new SAM'S (surface-to-air missiles) technology , These systems integrated radar-guided and air-launched radar-guided missiles, all networked with early warning, acquisition, and targeting radars, and coördinated within sophisticated command and control frameworks.

Because of such threat to security DARPA embarked on a program to develop strategies and technologies for reducing radar detectability,this also included technologies that changed more conventional shapes of aircraft to something much more reductive to radar detection through a combination of shaping (to minimize the number of radar return spikes) but it didn't just stop at that the list goes on with radar absorbent materials; infrared shielding, exhaust cooling and shaping, and enhanced heat dissipation; reduced visual signatures; active signature cancellation; inlet shielding; and windshield coatings.

All this development eventually led to a project named 'HAVE Blue', this was the first practical combat stealth aircraft, after making its first test flight by the end of 1977. The test and refinements continued leading to the realization of of the F-117A stealth fighter, which became operational in October 1983. In the follow-on development, the TACIT Blue aircraft, could operate radar sensors while maintaining its own low radar cross-section. This also inspired development of the B-2 stealth bomber.

haveblue prototype.jpeg

LOCKHEED MARTIN HAVE Blue f117 prototype

f117 stealth fighter, aka nighthawk 


Since their inception these stealth aircraft have destroyed key targets in conflicts in Iraq, both in the 1991 'Desert Storm operation' and in 2003 during 'Operation Iraqi Freedom'; in Afghanistan during Operation Enduring Freedom in 2001; and in Libya in 2011

Article by :

Jack Amperes

- page 1 of 3

powered by the exploratory minds project